Question: anyone using NOCompletion setting?
Hi, There are two completion modes currently: the standard one and the NOControler setting the NO option has the idea that it sorts ânewlyâ compiled selectors first, else it is the same. Is anyone using this setting? Marcus
I use it sometimes. IIRC there was a paper that it was objectively better at finding the "right" thing. Are you thinking of removing it? ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
On 18 Jun 2019, at 19:34, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
I use it sometimes. IIRC there was a paper that it was objectively better at finding the "right" thing. Are you thinking of removing it?
I would like to re-implement sorting of results in a more pluggable way⦠so that e.g. people can add more sorting ideas. But doing that in one step seems hard⦠it would be much easier if we could simplify the system first. Removing the Ocompletion (for a while) would make it much easier⦠Marcus
Marcus, this is an excellent idea! Alexandre
On Jun 19, 2019, at 4:15 AM, Marcus Denker <marcus.denker@inria.fr> wrote:
On 18 Jun 2019, at 19:34, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
I use it sometimes. IIRC there was a paper that it was objectively better at finding the "right" thing. Are you thinking of removing it?
I would like to re-implement sorting of results in a more pluggable way⦠so that e.g. people can add more sorting ideas.
But doing that in one step seems hard⦠it would be much easier if we could simplify the system first.
Removing the Ocompletion (for a while) would make it much easierâ¦
Marcus
Marcus Denker-4 wrote
Removing the Ocompletion (for a while) would make it much easierâ¦
I can live without it for a while, especially if we can plug it back in at the end! ----- Cheers, Sean -- Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Marcus Denker -
Sean P. DeNigris