Chris, "is possible?" yes ... I've gone through several different versions of FileTree where I've played different games with the meta data ... in the end I figured that to make it simple for folks to move back and forth that the meta data was best left intact ... With that said, I have several projects that are 100% stored in git and I am mightily annoyed by the extra meta data showing up as changes so I am getting close to nuking the meta data ... as an option .... but I have been busy working on "real projects" instead of spending almost this entire year working on infrastructure so I probably won't be making the changes real soon:) Dale ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Chris" <cpmbailey@btinternet.com> | To: "A friendly place where any question about pharo is welcome" <pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr> | Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 11:18:00 AM | Subject: [Pharo-users] FileTree queries | | Hi, | | I've just migrated to using FileTree with SVN and am wondering if it | is | possible to use it without the monticello.meta? You obviously get a | lot | of merge conflicts with these and the version file in particular, and | I | didn't really see much benefit when using SVN for commit comments and | revision histories and so forth so have just been ignoring / deleting | them. It seems to work ok for the most part and by loading packages | with | Gofer, but I feel like I'm fighting the system a bit and have not had | much luck with Metacello in particular which I would like to get | working | again. Can anyone advise? | | Thanks | Chris | |