Hi list, Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche? I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work. In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it? Thanks! Bernat. -- Bernat Romagosa.
On 10/17/2013 09:57 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:
Hi list,
Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?
I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work.
In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it?
Any reason you can't use say stud in front? stud is very small and just does exactly what you want :) https://github.com/bumptech/stud regards, Göran PS. Using SqueakSSL on server side does NOT scale.
The only reason is I didn't know about it! I'll take a look at it, thanks a lot :) Bernat. 2013/10/17 Göran Krampe <goran@krampe.se>
On 10/17/2013 09:57 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:
Hi list,
Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?
I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work.
In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it?
Any reason you can't use say stud in front? stud is very small and just does exactly what you want :)
https://github.com/bumptech/**stud <https://github.com/bumptech/stud>
regards, Göran
PS. Using SqueakSSL on server side does NOT scale.
-- Bernat Romagosa.
Wow, very useful thing! This one joins 'pen' http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/man1/pen.1.html :-) Phil On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Göran Krampe <goran@krampe.se> wrote:
On 10/17/2013 09:57 AM, Bernat Romagosa wrote:
Hi list,
Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?
I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work.
In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it?
Any reason you can't use say stud in front? stud is very small and just does exactly what you want :)
https://github.com/bumptech/**stud <https://github.com/bumptech/stud>
regards, Göran
PS. Using SqueakSSL on server side does NOT scale.
Hi Bernat, On 17 Oct 2013, at 09:57, Bernat Romagosa <tibabenfortlapalanca@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi list,
Is there a way to serve HTTPS via Comanche?
I can't use Zinc or Swazoo. Our app uses a version of Comanche that's pretty much hand-tailored for our needs, and switching would be quite a massive amount of work.
In case it's not currently supported, does someone know what would it take to implement it?
Have a look at ZnSecureServer, in particular at ZnSecureServer>>#socketStreamOn: Doing an #accept is basically all there is to it. HTH, Sven PS: Note that such a server does only work on Linux.
Thanks!
Bernat.
-- Bernat Romagosa.
participants (4)
-
Bernat Romagosa -
Göran Krampe -
phil＠highoctane.be -
Sven Van Caekenberghe