Re: [Pharo-users] BlueInk formatting (line length) Pharo5
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:50:41PM -0700, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:48:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Varvello <varvello@yahoo.com> To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Subject: Re: BlueInk formatting (line length) Pharo5
Hi Nicolai, Thanks for your reply.
Wow, 70 is not so much, especially because standard screens are wide, 16:9 sized. It's a pity it is not configurable.
But people normally code in Nautilus, where the code pane is actually quite small. But hard-coded line length explains some strange behavior I was experiencing... I thought that it was based on real nautilus width. Peter
Am 19.08.2016 9:05 vorm. schrieb "Peter Uhnak" <i.uhnak@gmail.com>:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 10:50:41PM -0700, Davide Varvello via Pharo-users
wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 22:48:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Davide Varvello <varvello@yahoo.com> To: pharo-users@lists.pharo.org Subject: Re: BlueInk formatting (line length) Pharo5
Hi Nicolai, Thanks for your reply.
Wow, 70 is not so much, especially because standard screens are wide, 16:9 sized. It's a pity it is not configurable.
But people normally code in Nautilus, where the code pane is actually quite small. But hard-coded line length explains some strange behavior I was experiencing... I thought that it was based on real nautilus width.
Peter
Yes, at some places it depends on the textarea width. But this had a bad effect in the diff view. As one diff pane is slightly wider, diffing two version of a method with the same code but different fornatting, was showing a difference, even with pretty printing turned on, as the lines were broken at different positions.
participants (2)
-
Nicolai Hess -
Peter Uhnak