Another pass on catalog web-site (Styling)
Hi, I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling⦠still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh) But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under âUnstableâ tag. The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :( PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS! cheers, Esteban
Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for Pharo 4? Uko
On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling⦠still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh)
But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under âUnstableâ tag.
The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :(
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS!
cheers, Esteban
âcause catalog does not takes duplicates, just the highest repository. Esteban
On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:34, Yuriy Tymchuk <yuriy.tymchuk@me.com> wrote:
Why does it show that QA has only conf. for pharo 5 if it also has one for Pharo 4?
Uko
On 12 Oct 2015, at 12:25, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I made another pass on catalog web-site. This time I just enhanced a bit the styling⦠still a lot to do but is looking better and better: http://catalog.pharo.org (you might need a force refresh)
But in fact, this announce is just an excuse to remember you to enhance your configurations with catalog information as described here: http://catalog.pharo.org/catalog/note-for-developers Also, if your configuration is proved to work on Pharo 3, 4 or 5, please copy your configuration into that repository, to avoid it to appear under âUnstableâ tag.
The Catalog is just as good as the information it provides: there is A LOT of very good packages no one will ever notice (like Aconcagua, for example), that does not provide *any* information and therefore they will never be used :(
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR CONFIGURATIONS!
cheers, Esteban
Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> writes:
âcause catalog does not takes duplicates, just the highest repository.
this "Pharo X" tag is misleading. I think all compatible Pharo versions should be displayed or none. -- Damien Cassou http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st "Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing enthusiasm." --Winston Churchill
participants (3)
-
Damien Cassou -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Yuriy Tymchuk