Hi all, Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out? Pierce
+1 to this question The "Pharoverse" is expanding faster every day. Esteban A. Maringolo El lun., 4 feb. 2019 a las 22:43, Pierce Ng (<pierce@samadhiweb.com>) escribió:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
Hi Pierce, I am currently writing a command-line tool which queries pharo repositories using the GitHub API, and based on the repository tag. Maybe not exactly what you asked for but it's a start. You can find the tool at: https://github.com/hernanmd/pi Cheers, Hernán El lun., 4 feb. 2019 a las 22:43, Pierce Ng (<pierce@samadhiweb.com>) escribió:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 12:52:37AM -0300, Hernán Morales Durand wrote:
I am currently writing a command-line tool which queries pharo repositories using the GitHub API, and based on the repository tag. Maybe not exactly what you asked for but it's a start. You can find the tool at: https://github.com/hernanmd/pi
Looks interesting. Thanks. Pierce
Hi, Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them). We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects. To find projects in GitHub, I have some queries: Tonel/filetree repositories (in .properties): https://github.com/search?q=%22%23format+%3A+%23tonel%22+in%3Afile&type=Code <https://github.com/search?q=%22#format+:+#tonel"+in:file&type=Code> https://github.com/search?q=%22%23format+%3A+%23filetree%22+in%3Afile&type=C... <https://github.com/search?q=%22#format+:+#tonel"+in:file&type=Code> Filetree repositories: https://github.com/search?q=.filetree+in%3Apath&type=Code <https://github.com/search?q=.filetree+in:path&type=Code> (Lots of this ones) We should build some tooling around this, Iâm quite sure is possible to do a lot more. Esteban
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com> wrote: Hi all, Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out? Pierce On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 15:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them).
We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects.
That would be very cool. Could that be something like a STON file people can text edit directly on github? Then for simple testing, could have a CI job that tests the new entries by diffing against the previous commit, to confirm that the specified version exists in the specified ConfigurationOf or BaselineOf. cheers -ben
On 5 Feb 2019, at 13:49, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 15:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote: Hi,
Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them).
We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects.
That would be very cool. Could that be something like a STON file people can text edit directly on github? Then for simple testing, could have a CI job that tests the new entries by diffing against the previous commit, to confirm that the specified version exists in the specified ConfigurationOf or BaselineOf.
cheers -ben
Let's not make it (too) complex, please. Everything has to be maintained (that is why 99% of all wikis are a mess). Even the old scheme (just copy the ConfigurationOf in the right repository) was not that easy to use (it required manual action to maintain). And can we please solve the problem that BaselineOf cannot be used as Catalog entries (or so I understood it).
On 5 Feb 2019, at 13:55, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 13:49, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 15:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote: Hi,
Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them).
We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects.
That would be very cool. Could that be something like a STON file people can text edit directly on github? Then for simple testing, could have a CI job that tests the new entries by diffing against the previous commit, to confirm that the specified version exists in the specified ConfigurationOf or BaselineOf.
cheers -ben
Let's not make it (too) complex, please. Everything has to be maintained (that is why 99% of all wikis are a mess).
The idea is to make it even easier than now (but so far nothing is defined). Something like (but this is JUST A DRAFT IN MY MIND): { #project : âMyCoolProjectâ, #description : âBlablablaâ, #tags: [ âaâ, âbâ, âcâ ], #versions : [ #current : â1.2.3â, #pharo7: â1.2.0â, etc. ], url: âgithub://estebanlm/MyCoolProject' } So you edit the versions to add new ones available (or user can ask for a branch like âmaster" directly, if they want). ⦠and of course, something similar for projects who still live at sthub or others. The only problem with this approach is that you need to fork the catalog to add your version, something Iâm still not convinced is the best solution (but no other way if using github). Finally, the tool in image would be the same. Esteban
Even the old scheme (just copy the ConfigurationOf in the right repository) was not that easy to use (it required manual action to maintain).
And can we please solve the problem that BaselineOf cannot be used as Catalog entries (or so I understood it).
The idea is to make it even easier than now (but so far nothing is defined). Something like (but this is JUST A DRAFT IN MY MIND):
{ #project : âMyCoolProjectâ, #description : âBlablablaâ, #tags: [ âaâ, âbâ, âcâ ], #versions : [ #current : â1.2.3â, #pharo7: â1.2.0â, etc. ], url: âgithub://estebanlm/MyCoolProject' }
That would be amazing. One advantage, is that removing junk project is an easy action. Cheers, Alexandre
On 5 Feb 2019, at 13:49, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com <mailto:pierce@samadhiweb.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 15:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi,
Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them).
We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects.
That would be very cool. Could that be something like a STON file people can text edit directly on github?
Yes thatâs the idea: ston files and PRs!
Then for simple testing, could have a CI job that tests the new entries by diffing against the previous commit, to confirm that the specified version exists in the specified ConfigurationOf or BaselineOf.
cheers -ben
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:59, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 13:49, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 15:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them).
We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects.
That would be very cool. Could that be something like a STON file people can text edit directly on github?
Yes thatâs the idea: ston files and PRs!
When you said "files" plural, my first reaction was that downloading multiple files might take too long on poor connections, but then I realised you might download the list in the form ```https://github.com/pharo-project/catalog/tarball/master``` since this is gzipped... ( https://blog.abelotech.com/posts/how-download-github-tarball-using-curl-wget... ) or were you thinking using libgit to sync it? cheers -ben
On 5 Feb 2019, at 14:14, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 20:59, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 13:49, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com <mailto:btc@openinworld.com>> wrote:
On 5 Feb 2019, at 02:42, Pierce Ng <pierce@samadhiweb.com <mailto:pierce@samadhiweb.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a definitive list of all the pharo-* organizations on GH? Like pharo-rdbms, pharo-nosql, pharo-vcs, ... Or, a way to query GH to find out?
Pierce
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 15:52, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com <mailto:estebanlm@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi,
Naming the teams âpharo-somethingâ was kind of my idea to improve visibility of pharo. This has been followed by others which means we do not know all organisations nor all pharo contributions are made under a pharo-something team (in fact the less of them).
We have in our TODO a new version of the catalog that will be âGitHub basedâ to group all projects.
That would be very cool. Could that be something like a STON file people can text edit directly on github?
Yes thatâs the idea: ston files and PRs!
When you said "files" plural, my first reaction was that downloading multiple files might take too long on poor connections, but then I realised you might download the list in the form ```https://github.com/pharo-project/catalog/tarball/master``` <https://github.com/pharo-project/catalog/tarball/master%60%60%60> since this is gzipped... (https://blog.abelotech.com/posts/how-download-github-tarball-using-curl-wget... <https://blog.abelotech.com/posts/how-download-github-tarball-using-curl-wget...>)
or were you thinking using libgit to sync it?
No, as you said. Esteban
cheers -ben
participants (7)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Ben Coman -
Esteban Lorenzano -
Esteban Maringolo -
Hernán Morales Durand -
Pierce Ng -
Sven Van Caekenberghe