would it not be better to have the html / css and js code outside the image ? so instead to load files instead of return strings ?��
this would make it easier to edit the code for html/css/js . GT js integration no idea how that works, does GT has for example syntax highlighting or other js specific features ?��
Even though I always have been a supporter of Amber the IDE has still a very long way to go. Dont know about Seaside, but I assume for Seaside js code will still be something foreign. I think in practice would be better to use the IDE tools offered by firefox and chrome, though its still possible to use both amber and these tools, amber does not produce readable js code. No clue about React and SqueakJS. I am very new to web dev so probably I miss a lot, but frankly I found the fragmentation so shocking and so many negative opinions about the whole workflow that I have been reluctant to invest as much time as I have invested in Pharo. But then the things I do are not so web orientated as other people. But still I am very interested into this.
SqueakJS looks definitely ��very interesting.��