Same with transducers/reducers, except they work by pushing values through the pipeline instead of pulling them. The library I started porting from VW last year had a dual API, one more like the original Clojure transducers, and one more like Xtreams.

One nice point of going collection��stream & filters��result is that the final step is explicit, so you can pick what kind of result you build (could be a collection or a single aggregated value).

On 29 September 2016 at 12:40, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:

2016-09-29 12:39 GMT+02:00 Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com>:

and collect: could be rewritten to use a generator.

Now does anybody play with this already?

Does xtream provide a way to do something in the same vein?

Yes. XStream supports it:

(1 to: 1000) reading transforming: [:in :out | | each | each := in get. out ��put: each -1; put: each; put: each + 1]��

But you probably wants different:

(1 to: 1000) reading collecting: [:each | {each -1. each. each + 1} ]��