Hi Peter,

don't want to discuss about that endlessly :-)
We receive already all a lot of emails from various lists.
There may be a few off-topic messages, but let's try to focus mainly on Pharo on pharo-users mailing-list.
There was a message from Stephane about that some days ago and I agree with him.

People who want to discuss about merits of Smalltalk, should create a Smalltalk advocacy mailing-list.
There is also an off-topic channel on Discord also.

Best,

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:03 PM PBKResearch <peter@pbkresearch.co.uk> wrote:

Norbert

��

Is that really all you can see? If you trace back this thread, it began with a post (less than 24 hours ago) by Richard Kenneth Eng, drawing attention to a blog post by Lorenzo, whose title is also the subject of the thread:

https://smalltalk.tech.blog/2020/02/04/fuzzy-thinking-in-smalltalk/��

Everything since then has been talking about that or about finding a link to an earlier post by Lorenzo.

��

I found the post interesting; my reaction is to wish there were more details. It is not Pharo, but is a Smalltalk application. I see no reason why you and Serge should say this is not suitable for this group; there are many posts here about non-Pharo Smalltalk activities.

��

Peter Kenny

��

��

From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of Norbert Hartl
Sent: 05 February 2020 11:23
To: Pharo users users <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Fuzzy Thinking in Smalltalk

��

��



Am 05.02.2020 um 10:53 schrieb Lorenzo <lorenzo@edor.it>:

��

I am sorry; I was not awer of this kind of problem.

Do you think that an application in Smalltalk is not interesting for Pharo users even if it has been developped in Pharo?

��

which application? I just read about things you've lost and wordpress problems regarding a blog.

��

Norbert



Lorenzo

��

���h���

��

Int. Research Unit

��on Modelling/Simulation of Complex Systems (UMMISCO)

���Sorbonne University

��(SU)

French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD)���

U

���niversity of Yaound�� I���

��

"Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute."
https://twitter.com/SergeStinckwich

���

��



--
Serge Stinckwic
���h���

Int. Research Unit
��on Modelling/Simulation of Complex Systems (UMMISCO)
���Sorbonne University
��(SU)
French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD)���
U
���niversity of Yaound�� I���, Cameroon
"Programs must be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute."
https://twitter.com/SergeStinckwich
���