Maybe I���m missing something, or maybe I���m not ���everyone���, but I���ve only had a few problems with 32 bit Pharo 7 and Windows.�� Btw Windows 10 ���64 bit��� is about as 64 bit as Windows 95 was 32 bit.�� i.e. not very.�� Most of the issues center around Moose, not the core Pharo.�� But I���m only playing with Pharo 7, mainly on Linux where the latest image seems pretty stable. ��My actual development is still on 61 (and in one case, 5.0 since it requires the old FFI).

 

M$ is supposed to fix the remains of 32 bit Windows next year, but we all know what ���next year��� means to Microsoft, it���s forever ���next year���.

 

As far as I understood, most of the development of Pharo 7 is focused on the 64 bit version in any case.�� What���s missing from 61 that you absolutely have to have ATM?��

 

Andrew

 

 

 

From: Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2018 5:26 AM
To: Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>
Cc: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Where do we go now ?

 

BTW, why put an .exe installer for Windows available when it crashes right from the start? It just doesn't work at all.  Period.  For everyone.

 

And I thought looking for senders of a method was something we mastered a long time ago, like starting with Smalltalk-76.  Am I supposed to assume that everything, even basic functionalities, are all broken because it's labeled "alpha" ?

 

 

-----------------
Beno��t St-Jean
Yahoo! Messenger: bstjean
Twitter: @BenLeChialeux
Pinterest: benoitstjean
Instagram: Chef_Benito
IRC: lamneth
Blogue: endormitoire.wordpress.com
"A standpoint is an intellectual horizon of radius zero".  (A. Einstein)

 

 

On Friday, April 13, 2018, 5:20:28 a.m. EDT, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 



On 13 Apr 2018, at 11:07, Benoit St-Jean <bstjean@yahoo.com> wrote:

 

I'm on Windows 10, using Pharo 7.0 alpha 32 bit.

 

 

and btw��� which part of ALPHA you do not get?

 

Esteban