Thanks Bernardo
��
That construct works as required, however I���m not sure what the semantic difference is to my original.�� I seems counterintuitive.�� Could you expand on what is going on for my benefit (if you have time).
Again thanks.
��
Also do you have a view on my description of the asDate result, and whether it should self-validate the receiver and raise an exception?
��
Regards
R
��
From: Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras <vonbecmann@gmail.com>
Reply to: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Date: Tuesday, 1 March 2022 at 15:05
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: [Pharo-users] Re: ByteString asDate��
try to send the #on:do: message�� to a block. try this
��
^ [ (Date readFrom: self pattern: ���dd/mm/yyyy���).��
�� �� ��true ]�� on: DateError do: [ false].
��
��
��
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:52 AM Robert Briggs via Pharo-users <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
I may be being stupid but the current Date Class does not appear to protect itself against a ByteString that is not in valid date format, e.g. by raising an Error.
��
e.g. the code �����ABC��� asDate opens the Debugger on #isLetter was sent to nil because it appears to expect more letters after $C but the peek returns nil instead.
This seems to me to require a more defensive programming approach.
��
I would like to validate a user input as a valid date in a number of different formats before converting it to a Date and storing it in my model.
��
I���ve tried using the Date parser, e.g.
��
Date readFrom: '04/02/2013' readStream pattern: 'dd/mm/yyyy'.
��
��
This is fine for simply parsing a valid string but rates a DateError if it doesn���t match the .�� So entering ���04/13/2013��� cleverly raises ���DateError: There is no 13th month���.
��
My thought was I could use this to return a simple true/false result in a ByteString extension in my application for example as follows:
��
ByteString >> isValdiDate
��
(Date readFrom: self pattern: ���dd/mm/yyyy���) on: DateError do: [^ false].
^ true
��
However this doesn���t intercept the DateError which is simply reported in the Debugger as before.���� This may be my lack of uncderstaning of the Exception handling in Pharo.
��
Any and all thoughts welcome.
��
R
��
��
��
��
��
��
--
Bernardo E.C.
��
Sent from a cheap desktop computer in South America.