I do not think that we want to have many extensions of the syntax.
We should enhance it but I do not see it changing and getting extended more.



Le 11/3/15 23:07, Tudor Girba a ��crit��:
I completely agree.

I think there are mostly pros. It can be that the parsing will be slower, but I do not think this is a critical issue for Pillar. It would be more important to have an extensible parser.

Cheers,
Doru



On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Damien Cassou <damien.cassou@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

The current pillar parser has several problems:

- it is hard to understand and change
- it discards input locations

I think a refactor or rewrite is necessary. What are the pros and cons of using PetitParser to do that?

Best



--
www.tudorgirba.com

"Every thing has its own flow"