On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 04:31, Steve Quezadas <steveeq1@gmail.com> wrote:
I usually like to go through the source code to answer my own question, but I can't tell by reading it.

[Morph], from what I understand, deals with manipulating graphics on smalltalk. But when I use ZnEasy to get a jpeg file, I notice that it returns a [Form] and not a [Morph] to display a jpeg. Spec2 also wants [Form] for displaying images rather than [Morph].

So what is the difference between a [Form] and a [Morph] since they both seem to deal with graphics?

I don't know the exact answer, but if you review method ImageMorph>>form��
you will see that the ImageMorph is a wrapper around a Form.

So some simple differences that may be inferred.
- Many morphs are not bitmaps.
- Morphs are GUI elements, i.e. interact with mouse and keyboard�� ��
- Forms are not GUI elements
- Forms can be manipulated without displaying them.

In some other graphics��system, an analogy��could be putting an image��on a button and asking "what is the difference between an 'image' and a 'button' ?"

wrt Spec2, Morph is one backend that Spec2 might use to display a Form,
or Spec2 might display the Form using a GTK widget.��

cheers -ben