It is not clear to me what the semantics of such a selector would be.
Consider this example:
��t := [:x | x copy == x].
��a := t value: 1.0e38.
��b := t value: 1.0e308.
What do you expect a and b to be?
GNU Smalltalk: a=true, b=true.
My Smalltalk, 32-bit or 64-bit: a=true, b=true.
Squeak/Pharo, 32-bit: a=false, b=false.
Squeak/Pharo, 64-bit: a=true, b=false.
Squeak/Pharo, after a patch: a=true, b=true.

There are two quite different reasons why x copy == x
might be true:
* x is immutable (including its parts), and can be
�� thought of as a mathematical value, so that there
�� is no need to copy it
�� Examples: every kind of number, characters,
�� booleans, immutable collections, block closures
* x is a way of accessing a unique resource, and
�� should not be copied, so making copy the identity
�� is a safety measure.
�� Examples: Semaphores, Mutexes, SharedQueues, data base
�� connections, some kinds of streams, singletons.
* Laziness or error (inherited method not revised).

What is your use case?



��



On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 at 07:32, Petr Fischer via Pharo-users <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org> wrote:
Hello, some classes, like Symbols or SmallIntegers, shares identity of value instances in the whole image (I may say it wrong), so:

1 == 1 copy. [true]
#aaa == #aaa copy. [true]

all other classes not, like Strings, Objects etc., so:

'aaa' == 'aaa' copy. [false]

Is there any test method (maybe on the class side) I could ask for this (isXXX)?

Thanks! pf