On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 2:21 PM phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
It is like Object>>in: aBlock no?
Yes.

But because it is an operator, you can write "obj => block => block => block".
You can not write "obj in: block in: block in: block", because smalltalk will think it is a selector named "in:in:in:".

Best,

Kasper��