Yes, I agree with most of the comments here. I'll try to summarize:

��- we should be able to specify the name of a project independently of their location/repository name

��- Maybe, for old projects that don't have a name, we could initialize a project's name as it's repository name?

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:07 AM Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:

Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it��s not going to be me for a little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels.

Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:

On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Tim Mackinnon wrote
> either by showing {owner}/{project}

What about when there are multiple remotes?

+1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded into the project name.
Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project name i.e. "owner-project"

cheers -ben
��

��	Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr Web: http://guillep.github.io Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13