A question I was meaning to ask, how efficient is STON at storing references , lets say I have an object that has instance variables that references another object and that object has a instance variable that references another object etc. Where exactly STON stops , or are there any limitations��

On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:58 PM Offray Vladimir Luna C��rdenas <offray.luna@mutabit.com> wrote:

Hi,

I'm using STON for my Grafoscopio[1][2] project with pretty good results. It's flexible, readable and well supported and document. Better that JSON! Pretty recommended.

[1] http://mutabit.com/grafoscopio/index.en.html
[2] http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~Offray/Grafoscopio

Cheers,

Offray


On 02/11/16 12:50, sergio ruiz wrote:
The funny thing about STON is that, as a professional developer, I am so used to the whole world being a ���hey, look! we have this too!!��� world, that I never looked into it at all..

I should have knows that that Pharo/Smalltalk community would, instead of ���me too��� would say.. ���look, here���s a cleaner, simpler, and more flexible way to do the thing..���

thanks, pharo/smalltalk community for being simple/flexible/clean !

On November 2, 2016 at 1:45:07 PM, Johan Fabry (jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl) wrote:

The book also talks about other storage mechanisms, see��http://files.pharo.org/books/enterprise-pharo/��

HTH,