Here is the difference in the output. And the first (with
Pharo3) is much more helpful because with a single command
one can understand ALL the packages loaded. Whereas, in
Pharo4, we don't get the complete tree and hence one has to
see the list of the individual configurations to understand.
linear load :��
linear
load : 2.1 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
load :
ConfigurationOfGrease
atomic
load : 2.1 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
load :
Glamour-Announcements-tg.5
load :
Glamour-Helpers-TudorGirba.25
--------long list continues--------------
linear load :
2.162 [ConfigurationOfMondrian]
load :
ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer
linear
load : 2.162 [ConfigurationOfMondrian]
load :
ConfigurationOfShapeST80
atomic
load : 2.162 [ConfigurationOfMondrian]
linear
load : 1.7 [ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer]
load :
ConfigurationOfXMLSupport
atomic
load : 1.7 [ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer]
explicit
load : XMLSupport
load :
ConfigurationOfXMLSupport-monty.75
load :
HealthReportProducer-Ivan_Rojas.13
load :
Nile-Base-DamienCassou.81
load :
Mondrian-ComplexShape-AlexandreBergel.33
--------long list continues--------------
linear load :��
linear
load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
load :
ConfigurationOfMagritte3
atomic
load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
linear
load : 1.14 [ConfigurationOfRoassal2]
linear
load : 11 [ConfigurationOfNeoJSON]
load :
Neo-JSON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.29
linear
load : 3.5.0 [ConfigurationOfMagritte3]
load :
Magritte-Pharo3-Model
load :
CollectionExtensions-TudorGirba.41
load :
Glamour-Roassal2-Presentations-TudorGirba.38