Why declare that as dead?

It is there and is okay to use.

People can update it if needed.

Why say this?
That's not constructive, man.

We need DB access.��
Pharo without DB access is going nowhere in the industry.

Just had a pairing session w/ Doru and guess what? The data I need for Moose/Roassal usage is in a database.

-_O

Phil


On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:29 PM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
Guillermo created Garage because the consortium asked and payed him to do and I think that he did it well. Now Guillermo does not use any database during his development and he is busy to work on many important tasks for Pharo.

I will ask Guillermo to declare Garage as dead and people should not come and cry that DB is not well supported in Pharo. I never understood why the code of UDBC was not pushed into Garage.

Stef

PS: So now people can tell me that I'm insulting torsten or whatever. Feel free. I found the situation quite sad in fact and quite also discouraging.




Le 17/10/16 �� 15:49, Esteban A. Maringolo a ��crit :
2016-10-17 8:12 GMT-03:00 Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name>:
Does anyone use Garage SQL drivers with sqlite in pharo >= 5?
Garage SQLite driver doesn't work on Pharo 5, the FFI API changed and
Garage wasn't updated to use UFFI.
You have to use Torsten version in UDBC.

Gofer it
�� �� �� �� ��smalltalkhubUser: 'TorstenBergmann' project: 'UDBC';
�� �� �� �� ��configuration;
�� �� �� �� ��load.
(Smalltalk at: #ConfigurationOfUDBC) loadBleedingEdge.


Regards,

Esteban A. Maringolo