Hi

Actually I am not using a specifc tool to generate feature models. For the moment, I am using XML Files to express features because tools like SPLOT use such format so it would be easy to export it into Moose.

It would be nice to have the Frascati feature model file, just to test some new metrics and visualisations and better understand the code :)

Abdelghani
 
De : Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>
�� : abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr>
Envoy�� le : Mercredi 24 juin 2015 17h03
Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] Moose

Hi!

No, we do not have a particular description of the text file. This was made in a very ad-hoc way, and very close to Familiar. Since I guess you are using your own platform to express features and variability, I guess this text description is not that useful for you.

Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Jun 24, 2015, at 8:13 AM, abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr> wrote:



Thanks for the document.
Since Familiar code is open, I may  want to reuse some parts of it.
I noticed there is a FMTexImportCommand class in the Familiar package. This is to load a feature model from a text description or file I gess.

What is the structure of such a file? Maybe you have some examples also?

Regards.
Abdelghani

De : Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>
�� : abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr>
Envoy�� le : Mardi 23 juin 2015 15h39
Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] Moose

What I try to do is to use Moose to model, raison  and do visualizations on feature models (a variability model used to model variability in software product lines)

In the feature model there is a concept called crosstree constraints relying two features (fonctionnalities)
example: aFeature requires aNotherFeature.
The relation goes from aFeature to aNotherFeature.

Okay. Interesting topic.
We did a bit of work on this, you may want to have a look at it:

Cheers,


Alexandre



Regards

De : Alexandre Bergel <alexandre.bergel@me.com>
�� : abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr>; Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Envoy�� le : Lundi 22 juin 2015 19h41
Objet : Re: [Pharo-users] Moose

Hi!

I have never used the previous and next. No idea whether this is used or not.
What are you trying to achieve?

Cheers,
Alexandre
-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



On Jun 22, 2015, at 12:06 PM, abdelghani ALIDRA <alidrandco@yahoo.fr> wrote:

Hi everybody,

when working with the FAMIX meta model, one must implement the previous, next, from and to methods for each class extending FAMIXAssosiation.
What is the diffence between previous/from and next/to?
if I make
MyFamixClass>>from
^previous
the same information is displayed twice in the Moose panel (because both methods are annotated with the MSEProperty in the superclass)
Who can one avoid that?

Regards

Abdelghani