Ok, this error was due to a problem with my Metacello configuration. I am having a very hard time using metacello, spent almost all of yesterday trying to figure out a fix....

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:18 PM Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormcruz@gmail.com> wrote:
Using directly the remote repository with https I got ZnTooManyRedirects :��(

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 8:56 PM Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormcruz@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks C��drick, this partly worked because I also had a git repository, but I noted that if the .git folder is not present the procedure don't work as well. It, however, cannot load remote dependent projects or baselines, and thus fail. :(



Livre de v��rus. www.avg.com.

On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:03 PM C��drick B��ler <cdrick65@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Vitor,

Le 12 nov. 2018 �� 19:53, Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormcruz@gmail.com> a ��crit :

Hello,

How do I load a baseline located at disk? I tried inside /home/vitormcruz/testpharo/:

./pharo Pharo.image eval "Metacello new baseline: 'Employees'; repository: 'filetree://employees/pharo'; load: #(core)"

But then I got:

Could not resolve: BaselineOfEmployees [BaselineOfEmployees] in /home/vitormcruz/testpharo/pharo-local/package-cache filetree:///home/vitormcruz/testpharo/employees/pharo

I use towel format.

I could load from local repo by using something like:

Metacello new
baseline: 'ICTWorkbench';
repository: 'gitlocal://../../iceberg/cdrick65/ICTWorkbench' ;
load.

Not sure if it���s the correct way.

My git repo are in a common iceberg dir. I use the launcher, so iceberg dir is in the root Pharo dir (I changed the default).

HTH,

C��drick






And ls -la of /home/vitormcruz/testpharo/employees/pharo gives:

drwxrwxr-x 4 vitormcruz vitormcruz 4096 Nov 12 16:21 .
drwxrwxr-x 4 vitormcruz vitormcruz 4096 Nov 12 15:57 ..
-rw-rw-r-- 1 vitormcruz vitormcruz 69 Nov 12 16:21 .filetree
-rw-rw-r-- 1 vitormcruz vitormcruz 21 Nov 12 15:57 .propertiesdrwxrwxr
-x 2 vitormcruz vitormcruz 4096 Nov 12 15:57 BaselineOfEmployeesdrwxrwxr
-x 2 vitormcruz vitormcruz 4096 Nov 12 15:57 Employees

��It is strange that it tried to access the local cache, is that correct? Im am using an Ubuntu 16 lst distribution.

Regards,
Vitor