I received this comment from someone who complained:
*What about the lack of documentation? From time to time I���ve checked some
SmallTalk implementations like Squeak, GNU-Smalltalk and now Pharo. Of
these, only GNU-SmallTalk appears to have a free, official programming guide
and core library reference that any serious programmer expects from a
language.
https://www.gnu.org/software/smalltalk/manual-base/html_ node/*
I pointed to Pharo's documentation but then he came back with:
*Then show me a link of the free, maintained reference documentation for the
classes that form ���the core library���, like this one for Python
(https://docs.python.org/3/library/index.html)*
It's true, most Smalltalks do not have a core library reference, not even
VisualWorks! So what is the proper response to this complaint?
Thanks.
--
Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html