> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 3:14 PM, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
>>
>> Sure. Current main issue is to have Pharo work with Kerberos as secured Hadoop uses the UGI (UserGroupInformation) thing and that is a black hole of crypto things.
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:15 PM, henry <henry@callistohouse.club> wrote:
>>
>> Of the 4 types of integration, I vote for and step forward to volunteer to help Kerberos integration in Pharo. What to do? ��
> ��
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Paulo R. Dellani <dellani@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> This all sounds very interesting. What is the idea? Wrap libkrb5 through UFFI or implement it in Smalltalk?
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:06 AM, phil@highoctane.be <phil@highoctane.be> wrote:
>>
>> There are two key Kerberos implementations one can use with Hadoop.
>> One is the FreeIpa/RedHat IdM.
>> The other is ActiveDirectory.
>>
>> I am using FreeIPA which bundles MIT Kerberos/389/sssd and more for making a CA etc. Works wonderfull�� well.
>>
>> AD is well ... part of the corporate landdscape.
>>
>> Most of Kerberos needs are done with Java in Hadoop. But details are buried in private Sun classes..
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 6:23 PM, henry <henry@callistohouse.club> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have no idea which is best. For being able to say we use industry standard Kerberos, calling an accepted implementation seems wise, like OpenSSL support.
>
> ��
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 4:51 AM, henry <henry@callistohouse.club> wrote:
>>
>> ��How about Kerberos? Can we get a team to look closely at bringing integration for enterprise users? That would be helpful, or can you just put it behind a Kerberos wrapper? If that would work, collecting a demo, that could unlock more corporate wallets , for investment.
>>
>>