On 26 May 2016, at 14:49, Johan Fabry <jfabry@dcc.uchile.cl> wrote:Yes, and there was also some discussion on the Pharo-users mailing list. Apparently the same comments more or less ...I give a big +1 on moving the buttons down, so that they are between the stack and the code pane. I still don���t understand why they need to be so far away from the code pane, it makes much more sense above the code pane + we save on mouse movements.
--Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don���t mean to be rude! Please see http://emailcharter.org .
Johan Fabry - http://pleiad.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD and RyCh labs - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of ChileOn May 26, 2016, at 04:37, Christophe Demarey <Christophe.Demarey@inria.fr> wrote:Hi Sabine,this point was also �� discussed �� (no answer) here: http://forum.world.st/gtdebugger-debug-actions-buttons-td4874316.htmlYes, the new buttons are counter-productive and there is even no setting to have them usable ���You can still with to the SpecDebugger through settingsLe 25 mai 2016 �� 22:49, Peter Uhn��k <i.uhnak@gmail.com> a ��crit :Hi,yes, this question was raised before, but there are some disagreements over how it should be, so it may take some time http://forum.world.st/GTDebugger-shortcuts-usability-td4890316.htmlYou can also use a startup script to reassign them, such as this one. https://github.com/peteruhnak/pharo-scripts/blob/master/config/5.0/uniformDebugger.stBut a startup script is a temporary solution.On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Sabine Manaa <manaa.sabine@gmail.com> wrote:Hi,
today I moved to Pharo5. It is great to get feedback and solutions for
problems so quickly. It is a pleasure to work with Pharo and to have the
community. I am grateful for having this.
I have one comment. I don't want to complain, I can use it but I was
wondering about the new position and size of the debugger buttons.
There is a longer distance now from code text pane to the buttons - I see
this as disadvantage to earlier versions of Pharo from the user experience.
The buttons are a lot of smaller - same disadvantage - both if you use the
mouse.
Ok, after seeing that, I thought "Sabine, you should use keyboard shortcuts
here, too" (I use much of them but interesting - til now not in the
debugger).
Then I saw the shortcuts for
Proceed cmd+r
Restart cmd-shift-a
Into cmd-e
over cmd-shift-o
through cmd-shift-t
especially into, over and through have so different key combinations, two
with shift, one without shift. When I debug, I often use for example
into-into-over-over-over-throuhg-through--into-into etc...and with the
combinations cmd-e and cmd-shit-e, it is more "finger-work". It would be
better to have all those shortcuts with or all shortcuts without shift. And
the letters not so far away at the keyboard (e-o-t)
This is only my opinion and my first impression after one day with Pharo5. I
am sure, after a few days, I forgot that this was uncomfortable because I
have the shortcuts coming automatically into my fingers.
Regards
Sabine
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/One-comment-to-new-Pharo5-debugger-tp4897390.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.