I will setup a class with examples, open an issue and then reply here.On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:20 AM hogoww <pierre.misse-chanabier@inria.fr> wrote:I wanted to take a look at this, but I could not reproduce the issue, although I distinctly remember I had the issue at some point.
Could you describe the problem further please?
Pierre
On 21/05/2020 12:06, Guillermo Polito wrote:
I think what Stef means:��- yes, please open an issue (maybe check there is no one already there?)��- If somebody wants to give it a try at fixing this, it would be SUPER welcome :P :)�� �� �� (and that nobody needs to be an expert to do that, it���s the other way around, you become an expert by doing it ^^)
El 20 may 2020, a las 21:16, Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormcruz@gmail.com> escribi��:
Ok, so should I open the issue or leave it as it is?
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:08 PM St��phane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse@inria.fr> wrote:
There is what we would love to have and there is what we have.��It is difficult to conserve the formatting of the original method especially on extract��or more generally on code transformation.��Now it does not mean that we like it this way.��But given the ratio income/results I think that Pharo is super super good.��
But but��people can help��people can pay for more.��
S.��
On 19 May 2020, at 19:33, Vitor Medina Cruz <vitormcruz@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
When I run a refactoring, Rename Method, for example, the refactoring is reformatting the code affected. Is it possible to configure Pharo to refactor without reformatting code? Depending on the refactoring, the reformat is so intrusive that make it more worth to make the refactoring by hand.
Regards,Vitor
--------------------------------------------St��phane Ducasse03 59 35 87 52Assistant: Julie Jonas��FAX 03 59 57 78 50TEL 03 59 35 86 16S. Ducasse - Inria40, avenue Halley,��Parc Scientifique de la Haute Borne, B��t.A, Park PlazaVilleneuve d'Ascq 59650France