and even if it would be unstable��� issues needs to be always reported, is the only way to be aware :)

On 26 Feb 2014, at 07:45, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

Nautilus is not unstable.��

That should not be happening and in fact I cannot reproduce it.��

Please report.��

On 26 Feb 2014, at 01:57, Robert Shiplett <grshiplett@gmail.com> wrote:

I am running from that latest.zip tonight and��PackageTreeNautilusUI >>update is getting a walkback messageNoUnderstood for

receiver of >>protocolsFor: is nil

I simply flipped to class view in Announcements and then flipped that toggle back.

Does this need to be reported, or is Nautilus still known to be unstable ?

thanks

I'll go back to my older 3.0 candidate for now ...

R

On 25 February 2014 19:02, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

none

just download this one:

http://files.pharo.org/image/30/latest.zip

is always the latest effective build.

Esteban

On 25 Feb 2014, at 21:05, Fran��ois Stephany <tulipe.moutarde@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'd like to download the latest Pharo 3 on the CI server but I don't know which one I should download?
>
> The last one on the list?
> <Screen Shot 2014-02-25 at 21.03.07.png>