A simple test for logos is: make it tiny (~20 pixels high = the favicon of a website) and it should still work (meaning it should be visible, legible, and recognizable). Even better if just a monochrome silhouette still works.

Try that with the logos of major brands.

On 18 March 2016 at 19:30, Offray Vladimir Luna C��rdenas <offray.luna@mutabit.com> wrote:
I share the impressions of Cyril here. The relation between the "P" and the rest of the "illar" seems too much disproportionate. The second pillar doesn't help with readability and I know about Pharo things kind of "sea" related, but I would try to focus more on known pillars like [1] or [2] as a base for abstractions instead of the ones behind the piers.�� Logos are difficult and you're making a great work with the code, so is nice to that you're taking the feedback also with the art of Pillar.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Colonne-p1040009.jpg
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Schema_Saeulenordnungen.jpg

Cheers,

Offray


On 18/03/16 11:43, Cyril Ferlicot wrote:
Hi,

Personally I do not like it. (Maybe I'm difficult :) ).

I think that it would be better to have the "illar" at the bottom and not compressed in the middle.

The second column look like an "y" and we read "Pillary".

And��why is there a wave under pillar?��
I think that things in a logo have to be symbolic and I do not find anything from the wave.��

Anyway, thank you to invest your time in pillar :)

On Friday, 18 March 2016, Thibault ARLOING <thibault.arloing@hotmail.fr> wrote:

Hi,


With a mate, we've worked on a logo for Pillar.

We just want feedbacks on it.


You can fin the logo join files.


thanks :)


Good afternoon,

Thibault



--
Cheers
Cyril Ferlicot