On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 at 15:52, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:

��- Maybe, for old projects that don't have a name, we could initialize a project's name as it's repository name?

In any case, I'd expect the project name within Iceberg to match the name of the working directory on disk.

Possibly even the project renamed within Iceberg should rename the disk working directory.

(btw, I don't know if "project name" is the best term, but I can't think of a better one.)

cheers -ben

��

On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:07 AM Tim Mackinnon <tim@testit.works> wrote:
Sounds like the user override is what we are after - I guess we need to make a pr ... sadly my laptop has died so it��s not going to be me for a little while until I can find an Apple store on my travels.

Tim

Sent from my iPhone

On 2 Oct 2018, at 12:30, Ben Coman <btc@openinworld.com> wrote:

On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 at 23:16, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
Tim Mackinnon wrote
> either by showing {owner}/{project}

What about when there are multiple remotes?

+1 to what you imply here, that the owner/remote should not be auto-coded into the project name.
Remote are well handled within Iceberg.
The user though could add the owner as free text into a custom project name i.e. "owner-project"

cheers -ben
��

--

��

Guille Polito
Research Engineer
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189

French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr

Web: http://guillep.github.io

Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13