I would rather qualify Ubuntu as hell when deploying large setups of machines that have to be kept in working order for a long while.

We should give top notch support for RHEL if we want to be relevant in spaces like Hadoop for example as the reference platform is RHEL/CentOS.

Phil


On Oct 6, 2017 16:20, "Andrew Glynn" <aglynn42@gmail.com> wrote:
There's a reason it's referred to by numerous developers as R-HELL.

Andrew Glynn

-----Original Message-----

Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:46:20 +0800
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] Deploying on Linux with LibC version < 2.15
To: bruce.oneel@pckswarms.ch, Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Reply-to: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
From: Holger Freyther <holger@freyther.de>
On 5. Oct 2017, at 18:08, Bruce O'Neel <bruce.oneel@pckswarms.ch> wrote: Hi,
Hi!
Well, our redhat 6.9 systems have 2.12, so, that qualifies. And yes, we still have RedHat 6, and 6.9 was released only 6 months ago! It will finish extended support in a mind-blowing 7 more years in 2024. Redhat 5, still supported for another 3 years till 2020 has glibc 2.5.
for a brief moment you really scared me. I thought you referred to RedHat Linux 6 which was released in 1999 but you are referring to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL). As it turns out we have "latest" (as soon as a commit is made to pharo-vm.git) and hand curated "stable" (hand created source tarballs, rebuilt from a git commit of opensmalltalk-vm) for RHEL6 and CentOS 6. CentOS 6.x: # Add the repo $ yum-config-manager --add-repo http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/languages:/pharo:/latest/CentOS_6/devel:languages:pharo:latest.repo OR (for stable): http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/languages:/pharo:/latest/CentOS_6/devel:languages:pharo:stable.repo # Install 32bit packages (with X11 dependency for *-ui or not) $ yum install pharo6-32-ui.i686 or pharo6-32.i386 # Install 64bit packages $ yum install pharo6-64-ui.x86_64 pharo6-64.x86_64