On 10 Nov 2014, at 8:45 , Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier@gmail.com> wrote:



2014-11-10 7:59 GMT+01:00 Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen@veloxit.no>:

IMHO, the old compiler is right, whitespace should not be allowed in literals.

Whitespace can be \t or \n,\r which makes for strange literals (multilines) such as:

-

5

And would create ambiguity in some cases

is 4 - 5 two literals, or is it two literals separated by the - operator ?

For instance, 3 @ - 5 reads like gibberish.

But is 3 @ -5 a problem or not ? Why is the old compiler accepting -3 @ 5, and not 3 @ -5 ?

3 @ -5 is not a problem, and accepted by both.
3 @ - <space> 5 is what I object to (and Opal allows)
3 @-5 and/or 3 @- 5 is (rightly) disallowed by both.

Cheers,
Henry