On 11 Aug 2017, at 21:10, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:

hi,

On 11 Aug 2017, at 18:57, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:

Another step would be to get a minimal parser not relying on
PetitParser.

Let��s think differently: why not to include a tiny PetitParser?
Then we can think on:

- pillar sintax (better than just a restricted version)

*syntax*�� sorry for spanish intromission ;)

btw�� not just outside the image (as readme). There was a prototype about rich text (using pillar, of course) for class comments.

Esteban

- simplify other ��small parsers�� that are already on the image.
- we provide a tool to o cool stuff (instead relying as always in regexp, etc.)

cheers,
Esteban