It's worse than that anyway, now it's missing GTInspector. What package provides that class?
On Dec 14, 2014, at 3:06 AM, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:
I think that roassal packaging is naive.
Roassal core should not depend from Glamour
and there should be a RoassalGlamour configuration
Stf
Le 14/12/14 07:21, Daniel Lyons a ��crit :
I loaded Roassal2 from the Configuration Browser and it added some menu items, one of which produces a debug statement about GLMPager. The problem is easily remedied by installing Glamour. I suggest there is a missing dependency in ConfigurationOfRoassal2.
���
Daniel Lyons
���
Daniel Lyons