Are you saying that none of the JS was manually written or that some of it was and the rest is coming from an imported library.   I���m looking at the page in Chrome dev tools now.  

Exactly. That's the whole point of having PharoJS :-)

Exactly.�� But then I don���t understand Cincom���s motivation for architecting AppeX the way it did.

The HTML file imports 2 js file. One is the MatterJS library, and the other is generated by PharoJS

I prefer the DSL approach of PharoJS.�� The code is clean, brief, clear, and anglogrammatical.���� Easy to do in Smalltalk.�� Hard to impossible with JS. ��With AppeX you need to read and apparently write a good amount of JS.�� What���s the point?�� Much of the utility of Smalltalk is then lost except the debugging is better.

Shaping