>> What is the relation between the glorp we have with the VW version?not entirely true.
>
> Outdated, according to Alan Knight in response to a bug I reported.
> The truth is no one knows.
we know that is outdated :)
Now, our version was ported from (AFAIR) 7.1 and extended to allow our drivers.
Probably next time best path of porting is to make a bridge between VW driver API and ours (but I didn���t estimated the amount of effort).
>> The DBXTalk guys narrowed the gap, but still���
>> Are the two merged often?
>
> As I understand it they kind of forked, because even though GLORP has
> its own multi-dialect layers, it still was "too VW/PGSQL".
something like that, yeah :P
> I'd join an community driven "ORM Task Force" for Pharo. IMHO merging> VW's and Pharo's version won't be an easy quest.
> While debugging GLORP I learnt a few things about its internals, and I
> think other users share the same learning process.
> So I am willing to spend some time on this. :)