> Am 09.08.2015 um 14:36 schrieb Tudor Girba-2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden email]>:
> However, I notice that you have some distinct version names, and this seems to throw MC off. For example, when trying to load the latest version of ConfigurationOfJNIPort:
> - we get: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3.0a3
> - instead of: ConfigurationOfJNIPort-JoachimGeidel.3.0a4
>
> This problem would be fixed if we would change the numbering a bit. For example, when I try to commit a new version of the configuration, Monticello offers:
> ConfigurationOfJNIPort-TudorGirba.3.5
>
> Is it Ok if I commit it like this?
Yes, of course, do whatever it takes. I used the ���aN��� suffer because I considered that version as an alpha release, and wanted to do a lot more before publishing a ���real��� release.
Cheers,
Joachim
View this message in context: Re: troubles with JNIPort on Pharo 5 / Java 8
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.