On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:17 PM, T. Edwin King
<kizzle42@gmail.com> wrote:
Forgive me if this is the incorrect forum for Glorp, but I'm interested in
Pharo and not Squeak.
Hi Edwin. This is a good place. In addition, for GLorpDBX/SqueakDBX� specific questions you can also use our own mainling� list.But this is fine here too.
�
It seems that there are multiple projects around for Glorp (on
Squeaksource), and there appears to be differences in what is available
(particularly Ramon Leon's MagritteGlorp/GlorpSeaside and ActiveRecord).
Yes, but as far as I understood those where just some development from Ramon.
�
So is there an "official" Glorp project (I use the term loosely)?
The problem is what you mean by official. I take care about making GlorpDBX/SqueakDBX to work (and develop) on Pharo, and I am a pharo developer also. Is that "official" enought?
>From the original Glorp developers, there is no Pharo support. WE have to take care.
I suggest you to read:
http://www.squeakdbx.org/GLORP integration
�
I have succeeded in getting ConfigurationOfGlorpDBX 1.3 up and running in a
Pharo 1.1.1 image with CogVM, against PostgreSQL and Sqlite3, on MacOS X in
64-bit kernel mode no less. �
WOW!� you make it work with SqueakDBX, with Cog, against PostgreSQL and Sqlite3, and using 64bits, without asking a single question???� wow, you are good :)
�
And the GlorpTests mostly run except for 8 or
9. �But I don't see the same packages/classes as those that are available in
the Glorp project.
Regards,
TEK
--
View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Is-there-an-official-Glorp-project-package-tp3027707p3027707.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Pharo-users mailing list
Pharo-users@lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-users