I propose this as an exercise.
Now I was not aware that we have doubleLinkedList in the system.

I do not get why DoubleLinkedList is packaged in System-Caching and not Collections-DoubleLinkedList?
������ https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/17360/DoubleLinkedList-should-be-packaged-in-Collections-DoubleLinkedList������
Stef


Le 5/1/16 02:50, Peter Uhn��k a ��crit��:
Wouldn't it be better to improve the current (Double)LinkedList instead of creating new ones? DLL had some improvements recently and I am not aware that it's missing something.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
Hi Yann,

> On 04 Jan 2016, at 22:11, Yann Dubois <yann59.dubois@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello World, Happy new year 2016 !

And to you too.

> I actually work on an integration of a double linked list on Pharo and I have a little interogation.
> It's better to use recursivity or senquential algorithm ?

Recursive is often cleaner, sequential is often faster.

> Yann

There is already a (minimal) DoubleLinkedList in the image ...

Sven