On 06 Oct 2015, at 15:53, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de> wrote:

2015-10-06 15:28 GMT+02:00 Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>:

On 06 Oct 2015, at 15:23, Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de> wrote:

2015-10-06 13:46 GMT+02:00 Henrik Johansen <henrik.s.johansen@veloxit.no>:

On 06 Oct 2015, at 1:33 , Nicolai Hess <nicolaihess@web.de> wrote:

2015-10-06 11:57 GMT+02:00 Werner Kassens <wkassens@libello.com>:

On 10/06/2015 09:09 AM, Nicolai Hess wrote:

 > Since Object has almost 500 methods whatever I will start typing
Object/TClass/TBehavior/... will have a list of answers...

I think this is difficult, even though this classes are big and you
don't use most of the methods,

Hi Nicolai,
imagine that code-completion is a game and the computer wins, if the user mostly uses the first few proposals. perhaps one could program several different heuristics, that decide, what the user wants. depending on the user choices, the weights for these heuristics get updated accordingly and then the choices get sorted with those weights. this way the code-completion could adapt to the way each user works?

Yes this would be nice, but it is not an easy task.

 

werner

I thought we already had something like that...

http://www.squeaksource.com/OCompletion/

I can not load it in a recen pharo image. 
Is it used in recent versions of squeak?

OCompletion is already in the image (since Pharo 2.0). 

if you check your settings, under "Code Completion���, Controller��� it should say NOCController. 

Funny, I always thought the NOC-Classes are some kind of "Old" NEC-Classes.
 

Is a lot better than older NECController, but still far from good enough.

Some more information on this? What is missing.

 

Esteban

 

Cheers,

Henry