On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 1:05 AM Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com> wrote:

I'm sorry if I offended somebody. I've deleted the repository (it was under pharo-repository, not under my name). With it the changes I made to make it work on Pharo7.

I understand that Peter's tool is easy, i've used it before.
But I have my constraints, as others has theirs.
Just note that lot of people complained but nobody took the work to migrate it with Peter's tool.
Why? If that's so easy :)

So I decided I was going to spend only ~1hour. It was��
��- Find the right code on sthub (Rmod repository or another one?)
��- loading the code + doing a commit (couple of minutes)
��- adapting the code for pharo 7
��- writing a baseline and testing it worked (in a new image, loading dependencies)
��- writing a readme, putting a link to the website

Also take into account that while tests run green on Pharo7, Milton's example was not working.

And that I had to test manually.

So count into my "hour" also:

��- loading Milton's code

��- (realize that I have to manually !!!!) load Roassal (otherwise his code does not load)

��- And test his code

Of course I'm not paid for this, I did it for Milton, because apparently nobody was taking "ONE HOUR" to answer his email.

And also there are a couple of Artefact examples (Jpeg related) that do not work since years and they add a bit of noise while you test because you don't know if there are more things broken or not.

All of them are little tasks of a couple of minutes. Count interruptions in the middle.
And now I'm sending this email out of frustration.

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:19 PM Norbert Hartl <norbert@hartl.name> wrote:

Am 28.09.2018 um 10:14 schrieb Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito@gmail.com>:

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:07 AM Torsten Bergmann <astares@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi Guille,

Yes, thanks. But it looks like the history is gone now - as��you seem to load and then commited
with Iceberg only.��

Yes, that's what I did.
��

By using Peters "STHub -> Git migration tool" the history of the changes is preserved and moved into
the git history too.��See https://github.com/peteruhnak/git-migration��
Would it be possible to use that?

Yes, that could be used. The thing is that I'm not Artefact's maintainer, and I did not want to invest more than one hour on this.
But if someone wants to take the bull from the horns, that's ok ^^.��

It is not that much work. Just copying the code under your username I consider rude. I spent a lot of time migrating repos to github of packages I��m not the maintainer of. The git-migration of Peter is so easy to use there is no reason not to use.��

History is important

Norbert
Guille

--

��

Guille Polito
Research Engineer
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille
CRIStAL - UMR 9189

French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr

Web: http://guillep.github.io

Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13

��	Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr Web: http://guillep.github.io Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13