Am .10.2018, 20:14 Uhr, schrieb Steffen M��rcker <merkste@web.de>:
> Dear all,
>
> I have two questions regarding parsing frameworks.
>
> 1) Do you have any insights on the performance of SmaCC VS Xtreams����
> Parsing VS PetitParser?
> 2) Has anybody started to port PetitParser 2 from Pharo to VW? Is it����
> worth the effort?
>
> Sorry for cross-posting, I thought this might interest both communities.
>
> Cheers, Steffen

I gave Xtreams-Parsing and PetitParser a shot and like to share my��
findings.[*]

The task was to parse the modelling language of the probabilistic model��
checker PRISM. I've written a grammer of about 130 definitions in the��
Xtreams DSL, which is close to Bryan Fords syntax. To avoid doing it all��
again with PetitParser, I wrote a PetitParserGenerator that takes the DSL��
and builds a PetitParser.

The numbers below are just parsing times, no further actions involved. For��
reference I show the times from PRISM (which uses JavaCC), too -- although��
they involve additional verification and normalization steps on the AST.

input�� Prism�� �� XP�� ��PP
230kB�� �� 14s�� �� 9s�� ��2s
544kB�� ��121s�� ��20s�� ��5s
1.1MB�� ��421s�� ��34s�� ��8s
1.4MB�� 1091s�� ��47s�� 12s
2.2MB�� �� �� �� �� 63s�� 16s
2.9MB�� �� �� �� �� 81s�� 20s
3.8MB�� �� �� �� ��107s�� 25s
4.4MB�� �� �� �� ��123s�� 30s

Please note that these times are not representative at all. It's just a��
single example and I put zero effort in optimization. However, I am quite��
satisfied with the results.

[*] I was already familiar with the DSL of Xtreams-Parsing, which I like��
very much. I did not consider SmaCC, as I find PEGs easier to use.

Best, Steffen

Thanks for your report Steffen. Nice to see such comparisons even when a bit apples & oranges.