On 15 Dec 2018, at 21:20, Roelof Wobben <r.wobben@home.nl> wrote:

You can find that one also with the finder.


overlappingPairsCollect: aBlock
    "Answer the result of evaluating aBlock with all of the overlapping pairs of my elements."
    | retval |
    retval := self species ofSize: self size - 1.
    1 to: self size - 1
        do: [:i | retval at: i put: (aBlock value: (self at: i) value: (self at: i + 1)) ].
    ^retval

can be found at sequenceCollection.

Roelof


Op 15-12-2018 om 21:03 schreef Nicole de Graaf:

p.s. and also Array>>#overlappingPairsCollect:  

Regards,

Nic

On 15 Dec 2018, at 20:52, Nicole de Graaf <nic@soops.nl> wrote:

Hi Roelof,

I started to read you code , can you please give me the implementation of: ByteString>>#includesSubstring:

Regards,

Nic

On 15 Dec 2018, at 19:36, Roelof Wobben <r.wobben@home.nl> wrote:

Hello,

I have this code : https://gist.github.com/RoelofWobben/7c08680797d1d9f84436653a0e4edd3b
as  my solution to a AoC challenge.


But the last test `testIsNice`  is still  outputting the wrong output.
The right output is :   `ugknbfddgicrmopn ` and `aaa`

Someone who can think with me where I make a thinking error so that the right output is seen.

Regards,

Roelof