Ok I should say that I do not understand the differences and why there are two versions of Smacc.

So I will stop maintaining the tutorial because now may be I should revert what I wrote.��

I was too stupid to do it in fact I should focus on my stuff and nothing else.��

This saddens me a lot. ��

We are a small community and we split ourselves into little chunks.

I do not get why there is no notion of economy and sharing in our culture.��

Stef

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:

Hi,

> On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:50 AM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK
> I loaded Smacc from github as mentioned by thierry.
>
> Metacello new
>�� �� �� �� �� baseline: 'SmaCC';
>�� �� �� �� �� repository: 'github://ThierryGoubier/SmaCC';
>�� �� �� �� �� load
>
> Are there two configurationOfSmacc?
> May be we should only have one no?
>
> I have the impression that even thierry and jason working heavily with Smacc do not know that.
> And we should not force them to use Moose. At least we do not have to win
> anything with it.

I did not mean to force anyone to use Moose. I just said it is already loaded there, in case you use it.

Moose relies on the ConfigurationOfSmaCC maintained by John. Thierry has another repository that he created before John moved his work to Pharo. But, now that he does work with Pharo Moose relies on his version.

Cheers,
Doru

>
> Stef
>
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Tudor Girba <tudor@tudorgirba.com> wrote:
> They come with the ConfigurationOfSmaCC which is already in the Moose image.
>
> Doru
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 2017, at 4:52 PM, Stephane Ducasse <stepharo.self@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > where can I load the Smacc gt extension and debugger extensions?
> >
> > Stef
>
> --
> www.tudorgirba.com
> www.feenk.com
>
> "Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
>
>
>

--
www.tudorgirba.com
www.feenk.com

"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."