Hi Esteban

I���m new and may be wrong and apologise if so ��� !

It just looked like the Crono package has a few things I didn���t expect :

• CrApplicationStarter

• CrGtkConfiguration

• CrWindowConfiguration

• SpPresenter extension firstResponder

• SpWindowPresenter extensions (2)

  These ���Cr��� classes seem to have some more general purpose behaviours that other SpApplications could use?

  And I would have thought the Gtk configuration would be outside Crono too?

  Also, presumably the extensions are candidates for repackaging outside/above Crono ���.?

This may be just a naming and packaging thing rather than any criticism of design.

In summary, as a simple consumer of the framework there was (some) surprising detail in the Crono package and classes that didn���t seem relevant to any new application I would be writing.

Hence I would have hoped not to have to clone these details (or even deal with them���).

Does that sound fair? - or do I have the wrong end of the stick !!

Cheers

Mark