Le 22/3/15 23:01, Sven Van Caekenberghe a ��crit :

On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:40, stepharo <stepharo@free.fr> wrote:



Le 22/3/15 22:05, Sven Van Caekenberghe a ��crit :

On 22 Mar 2015, at 21:44, Denis Kudriashov <dionisiydk@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi

It is another perfect task for XStreams:

r := #('a12' 'b12' 'a13' 'a14' 'c23' 'a16') reading selecting: [:each | each first = $a].
r get > a12
r get > a13

Beautiful !

Yes but with
r next.
r next

The choice for different selector names was intentional, by design. To avoid confusion, because #next and #get are not 100% identical (semantically). This is an important point.

No I asked martin personally. This is the real reason.�� There were also experimenting to offer an API closer to other language.
So that we have
r get.
r next: 4