Hi Sven��� a couple questions:- is there a preferred order of composition between the encoding and buffering streams ? If yes, it the same for read and write stream, or reversed ?E.g. if Stdio binaryStdin was implemented, Stdio stdin should be decoded, but buffering it as well would be a problem for interactive applications.
- what's your opinion on convenience composition messages, e.g. aBinaryStream buffered decoded: 'utf-8' ?
On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 at 10:13, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
> On 23 Jul 2018, at 12:07, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> Stdio stdout and friends just return a binary stream, hence they need wrapping for encoding.
>
> Maybe
>
>�� Stdio stdoutAsText
>
> might be an idea, but this is so uncommon that I am not sure this is a good idea.
Given all remarks and comments (thanks BTW), I now think that
- textual stdio streams are the more common case
- binary stdio streams are the primitive ones that are seldom used
- another encoding than UTF-8 seems uncommon
- these are streams that exist and need no real opening/closing
So,
�� Stdio stdout
should return return a character write stream with UTF-8 encoding while
�� Stdio binaryStdout
should be the lower level binary one.
This would be more in line with the other streams.
A non-UTF-8 encoding can be used as per Pavel's example.
|
������ | Guille Polito Research Engineer Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille CRIStAL - UMR 9189 French National Center for Scientific Research - http://www.cnrs.fr Phone: +33 06 52 70 66 13 |