Here is the difference in the output. And the first (with Pharo3) is much more helpful because with a single command one can understand ALL the packages loaded. Whereas, in Pharo4, we don't get the complete tree and hence one has to see the list of the individual configurations to understand.
linear load :��
linear load : 2.1 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
load : ConfigurationOfGrease
atomic load : 2.1 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
load : Glamour-Announcements-tg.5
load : Glamour-Helpers-TudorGirba.25
--------long list continues--------------
linear load : 2.162 [ConfigurationOfMondrian]
load : ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer
linear load : 2.162 [ConfigurationOfMondrian]
load : ConfigurationOfShapeST80
atomic load : 2.162 [ConfigurationOfMondrian]
linear load : 1.7 [ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer]
load : ConfigurationOfXMLSupport
atomic load : 1.7 [ConfigurationOfHealthReportProducer]
explicit load : XMLSupport
load : ConfigurationOfXMLSupport-monty.75
load : HealthReportProducer-Ivan_Rojas.13
load : Nile-Base-DamienCassou.81
load : Mondrian-ComplexShape-AlexandreBergel.33
--------long list continues--------------
linear load :��
linear load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
load : ConfigurationOfMagritte3
atomic load : 3.3.0 [ConfigurationOfGlamour]
linear load : 1.14 [ConfigurationOfRoassal2]
linear load : 11 [ConfigurationOfNeoJSON]
load : Neo-JSON-Tests-SvenVanCaekenberghe.29
linear load : 3.5.0 [ConfigurationOfMagritte3]
load : Magritte-Pharo3-Model
load : CollectionExtensions-TudorGirba.41
load : Glamour-Roassal2-Presentations-TudorGirba.38