On 22 November 2017 at 01:07, Alistair Grant <akgrant0710@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20 November 2017 at 09:16, Sven Van Caekenberghe <sven@stfx.eu> wrote:
>
> We can discuss about this ad infinitum. I think we all agree that
> there are 2 views (abstract calendar date and concrete time
> interval/span, which requires a TZ), as well as 2 possible ways to
> deal with the second case (TZ inside date or as context outside of the
> date).


Right, I think changing things now will be quite a bit of work.

However there are a couple of things we can do to make life a bit easier:

1. Add a method that facilitates TZ independent comparisons.
2. Add a bit more information in the class comments.


I've named the method #dmyEquals: below, although I don't particularly
like it.�� If anyone has a better idea, please reply.

how about #localEquals:
i.e. local ==> ignore timezones


btw, now we should move to discuss the default date format?
https://xkcd.com/1179/

�� ��\
;)-ben==
�� ��/