Matias
Thanks for the hints. I now have 5 greens, but all the rest are red. I am still getting the ‘File cannot be locked’ message. Are you doing better than that? I may try a few trials using it for real, rather than the test suite.
Thanks again
Peter Kenny
From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of Matias Maretto
Sent: 22 June 2018 22:54
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6
Hi Peter, yes I had the same error at the beginning. I have done 2 minor changes. Now it seems to be working fine (Although I am still running more tests). Here:
ODBWin32FileStream >>
closeHandle: aHandle
"Close an open Win32 object handle, freeing any resources held by it.
Once closed a handle is no longer valid. Answer whether the function
succeeds.
See Win32 SDK help for more information.
BOOL CloseHandle(
HANDLE hObject
// handle of object to close
);"
"<apicall: ulong 'CloseHandle' (long) module:'kernel32.dll'>"
^ self ffiCall: #(ulong CloseHandle(long aHandle))
ODBWin32FileStream >>
lockFile: aHandle offsetLow: loPos offsetHigh: hiPos lengthLow: loLength lengthHigh: hiLength
"<apicall: long 'LockFile' (long ulong ulong ulong ulong) module: 'kernel32.dll'>"
^ self
ffiCall: #(long LockFile #(long aHandle , ulong loPos , ulong hiPos , ulong loLength , ulong hiLength))
De: Pharo-users <pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org> en nombre de PBKResearch <peter@pbkresearch.co.uk>
Enviado: viernes, 22 de junio de 2018 09:45 p. m.
Para: 'Any question about pharo is welcome'
Asunto: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6
Matias
I have just loaded Esteban’s package in a new Pharo 6.1 under Windows 10. I get an error message saying ‘File cannot be locked. Try again?’. When I select ‘no’, all tests are run and give red. Are you still running on win 7? If so, I must be doing something wrong. Can you give more details of the FFI corrections you made, please?
Many thanks
Peter Kenny
From: Pharo-users <pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org> On Behalf Of Matias Maretto
Sent: 22 June 2018 21:07
To: Any question about pharo is welcome <pharo-users@lists.pharo.org>
Subject: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6
Esteban: it's working fine, I had to made a minor corrections on 2 FFI calls and now everithing seems to be working fine.
For What I saw with Voyage-UnqLite only String Objects can be used to searilize; Omnibase allow to persist almost any kind of objects, thats the part I like about it.
De: Pharo-users <pharo-users-bounces@lists.pharo.org> en nombre de Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com>
Enviado: jueves, 21 de junio de 2018 08:19 p. m.
Para: Any question about pharo is welcome
Asunto: Re: [Pharo-users] OmniBase for Pharo 6
I did it manually and I took like 5 min :P
but this was really easy, just a bunch of FFI calls.
Esteban
> On 21 Jun 2018, at 15:31, Sean P. DeNigris <sean@clipperadams.com> wrote:
>
> EstebanLM wrote
>> I just made a “blind port”… migrated the old FFI to new UFFI
>
> Did you do this manually or use some migration tool? How long did it take?
>
>
>
> -----
> Cheers,
> Sean
> --
> Sent from: http://forum.world.st/Pharo-Smalltalk-Users-f1310670.html
forum.world.st Pharo Smalltalk Users forum and mailing list archive. Pharo User Forum |
>