Oh, disk size is NOT the issue ! ��;-)


On 12 June 2013 08:12, LogiqueWerks <grshiplett@gmail.com> wrote:
If it is not under 50Mb with min packages + my classes, then I think no one in the minimalist camp is going to look at my efforts ( this is my "emit Curl markup" as alternative-to-HTML project for learning Japanese kanji via personalized mnemonics. )��

The first image would be to parse Yaml and emit Curl markup ; the second MAY use Seaside to respond with MIME of text/vnd.curl ��... but I still have so many issues to address ... and no Xvnc installed yet ... and only Python 2.6.6 so far on this CentOS 6.3��

My aversion to PCRE is a driving force here , so I have a lot of work to do ...



On 11 June 2013 07:41, Sven Van Caekenberghe-2 [via Smalltalk] <[hidden email]> wrote:
Robert,

What size are you aiming for ?

A normal Pharo image needs between 50 and 100 Mb, with everything included.

Not much in my book, are there such small VPS machines today ?
I run 6 such Images/VM pairs on a AWS EC2 micro instances (~600Mb RAM).
Linode starts at 1Gb ...

Sven

On 11 Jun 2013, at 12:14, LogiqueWerks <[hidden email]> wrote:

> re: headless Pharo 2.0
>
> I just finished building gst on a tiny VPS site, but I would rather use
> pharo ... I can get some tips from pharo --help in my SSH console but I have
> a big dev CentOS here in VirtualBox in which to experiment in headless
> builds if set on the right track ...
>
> Does anyone have a tip on starting with a Pharo 2.0 ��core ? I just need
> sockets, minimal HTTP and StdOut - I don't think I want Seaside on this tiny
> install ... but I would rather be using an HTTP server in Pharo than in Ruby
> or Python ... I have come to loathe Lighttpd and nginx config silliness ...
> but I could fallback to Ruby Sinatra or merb while I wait ... (the
> poor-man's Smalltalk ;-)
>
> Or should I be looking to strip down a VW image and wait for Pharo 3 ? ��I am
> scripting with Rebol 2 for now while I wait for rebol3 or Red ...
>
> thanks,
> Robert
> in a small Atlantic town
> Canada
>
> PS last night I could not see how to run St/X without X to see what mem
> footprint I would face !
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/minimal-headless-pharo2-for-CentOS-tp4692753.html
> Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>





If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://forum.world.st/minimal-headless-pharo2-for-CentOS-tp4692753p4692755.html
To unsubscribe from minimal headless pharo2 for CentOS, click here.
NAML



View this message in context: Re: minimal headless pharo2 for CentOS
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.