From my reading, it seems like whoever posted OmniBase to github 9 years ago added the MIT license without permission and the OmniBase library remains closed source.��
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 6:46 AM, sean@clipperadams.com wrote:
>
> I���m not fully understanding the issue.
>
>
>
> Is it that:
>
>�� �� �� ����� The repos are violating the library license (other than the erroneous MIT license, which could easily be updated)?
>
>�� �� �� ����� The fact that OmniBase is not open source violates a principle you have in continuing to host it?
>
> If the latter, may I suggest you offer to transfer the repo(s) to a willing party?
>